<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>kemper.FYI</title><link>https://kemper.fyi/tags/kuration/</link><description/><generator>Hugo</generator><language>de-DE</language><atom:link href="https://kemper.fyi/tags/kuration/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Algotorial</title><link>https://kemper.fyi/blog/2025-11-08-algotorial/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 22:37:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://kemper.fyi/blog/2025-11-08-algotorial/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;“Algotorial” &lt;a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/algotorial"&gt;bezeichnet&lt;/a&gt; eine Mischung aus &lt;em&gt;algo&lt;/em&gt;rithmischer und redaktioneller (edi&lt;em&gt;torial&lt;/em&gt;) Kuration und wurde offenbar von &lt;a href="https://engineering.atspotify.com/2023/04/humans-machines-a-look-behind-spotifys-algotorial-playlists"&gt;Spotify gecoint&lt;/a&gt;. Vor allem Meg Tarquinio, die ehemalige Head of Curation Strategy, scheint dafür verantwortlich. Sie redet &lt;a href="https://art-of-curation.simplecast.com/episodes/meg-taquinio-bG6bd88V"&gt;in diesem Podcast&lt;/a&gt; darüber, der jetzt in meinen Lesezeichen landet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Knowing what songs might be particularly “singable” is difficult to describe in algorithms.&lt;/strong&gt; It might be the song that was on repeat last summer, or a particularly catchy refrain that is repeated over and over. Maybe it appeared in a TV show or movie recently to remind you of your teenage years. &lt;strong&gt;It’s hard to describe why, but you know it when you hear it.&lt;/strong&gt; This is where human intuition comes in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ich habe inzwischen tatsächlich in den Podcast hereingehört und fand diese Stelle über die Notwendigkeit (oder vielmehr Überflüssigkeit) von individuellem Geschmack bei Kuration sehr aussagekräftig:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I actually am like anti-taste.&lt;/strong&gt; I don’t know that I believe in good taste or bad taste. A lot of times I think there’s this myth around editors and curation that suggests, ‘Oh, this person loves this song so they’re going to put it into a playlist.’ But I think for good curators, or just curators in general, that’s not how it works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, if you’re a curator in a space that you love – like folk music – and you’ve grown up listening to folk music, you’re going to love a lot of the music that you’re programming. &lt;strong&gt;But you’re not programming it because you love it. That’s just kind of a correlation versus causation situation.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you’re programming it because you understand the space and you understand the audience, and you know that they would love it in this specific context. &lt;strong&gt;So I think the more that you can divorce your personal taste from what you’re doing, or at least have an awareness that that’s just an association versus a reason for anything that you’re doing&lt;/strong&gt; – that’s the way to go for sure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="font-mono small color-secondary mt-2 text-end"&gt;–
Meg Tarquinio, ex-Head of Curation Strategy, Spotify
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>